Most midterm coverage focuses on taxes, tariffs and the headline fight for control of Congress. For investors in banks, brokers, insurers and payments businesses, the more consequential changes are often less visible. Here are five that are easy to miss.
Stablecoins are a fight over bank deposits.
Crypto legislation sounds like a niche issue, but it reaches deep into banking. The sticking point in the market structure talks has been a conflict between banks and crypto firms over how yield-bearing stablecoins should be regulated. Banks warn that without limits, stablecoins could become vehicles for savings and credit rather than simple payment tools. In other words, they could compete directly for deposits. The bill’s future depends on the vote: the CLARITY Act stalled in the Senate in September, and its chances of revival depend partly on whether Democrats take both chambers, which would force further concessions on ethics provisions. For deposit-funded lenders, that outcome matters more than it might appear.1
A credit card rate cap has unusual support from both sides.
Populist finance doesn’t follow party lines. Trump has called for a 10% cap on credit card rates, and in Congress, Senators Sanders and Hawley have introduced bipartisan legislation to cap rates at 10% for five years, with a matching House bill from Representatives Ocasio-Cortez and Luna. One policy analyst expects that after the midterms Trump will look for Democratic support for measures such as credit card rate caps and housing initiatives. Industry groups argue the effect would be severe: the Bank Policy Institute has warned that two-thirds of cardholders who carry a balance could lose access to credit or see their lines reduced. A divided Congress could make this idea more likely to pass, not less.2,4
A divided Congress could make this idea more likely to pass, not less.
Subpoena power can slow deregulation without repealing it.
A Democratic House couldn’t undo the administration’s regulatory agenda, but it could make it harder to carry out. A Democratic majority would gain subpoena power, larger investigative staffs and the ability to call agency heads and corporate CEOs to testify. Executives expect regulators may move cautiously on very contentious issues, since testimony and oversight requests take time. Capital relief for large banks may therefore come more slowly than investors expect. The CFPB is likely to be an early focus, as it has the authority to oversee nonbank competitors that challenge established banks.3
Small banks and big banks may be treated differently.
One of the few areas of genuine agreement could split the sector in two. Both parties say they support reducing regulatory burdens on smaller financial institutions, and one plausible compromise would pair lighter rules for community banks and credit unions with continued, or even stronger, oversight of the largest institutions. For investors, the regulatory outlook for a regional lender and a money-center bank could diverge noticeably over the next two years.5
Bond market volatility isn’t going away, whoever wins.
Neither party is campaigning on deficit reduction. One Washington policy firm expects that government bond market volatility will continue, as neither party is likely to make fiscal consolidation a governing priority. That’s a challenge for balance-sheet-heavy lenders managing interest rate risk. It can be an opportunity for businesses that earn from activity and dislocation, such as repo, trading and market-making firms.6
The bigger picture
Not every change will arrive. The same analysis that flags these risks concludes that even if Democrats win big, continuity will likely outweigh change in financial policy, with some room for bipartisan deals. Most of the administration’s regulatory agenda runs through agencies, which Congress can scrutinize but can’t easily reverse. Still, the midterms reshuffle who benefits within financial services: deposit-funded lenders and fintechs, small banks and large ones, balance-sheet lenders and market intermediaries. Investors who know the sector well enough to tell these businesses apart will be best placed to use the next two years.6
Sources
- 1. The Block, “Midterms, shutdown risks and negotiations: Can Congress pass a sweeping crypto bill in 2026?”
- 2. Reuters, “Trump calls for one-year cap on credit card interest rates at 10%”
- 3. Reuters, “Wall Street, crypto firms could face scrutiny if Democrats win majorities in midterms”
- 4. Bank Policy Institute, “The Potential Adverse Consequences of a Credit Card Interest Rate Cap”
- 5. Finovate
- 6. Substack
For information only; not an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security, and not investment advice.
Back to Insights